Contractor Management that Ensures Compliance Down to the Employee Level
Reimagining Contractor Qualification:
Contractor Management That Ensures Compliance Down to the Employee Level
Contractor Qualification (CQ) has been around for some time. Larger facilities face the paradoxical responsibility of safety compliance for employees that are not their own but are performing work on their job site. Since it would be near-impossible for owner/operators to implement an all-encompassing safety management program for another company’s employees, CQ programs allow owner/operators to pre-qualify sub-contractor companies to ensure adequate historical safety records and standards. While most CQ programs do a decent job ensuring sub-contracting companies meet certain metrics of safety during the Pre-qualification process, they stop short of ensuring only qualified employees are performing tasks on their jobsites. Through the simple application of existing technologies, Contractor Qualification programs can be improved to track ongoing compliance down to the specific tasks performed by individual employees.
Common CQ Program Requirements
Establishing Risk Thresholds: The owner/operator sets various risk thresholds and tier standards that contractors, sub-contractors, and vendors must meet in order to be able to perform work at their facility/jobsite.
Total Recordable Incident Rate (Typically must be < 4.0)
• Lost Workday Rate (Typically must be < 1.0)
• Experience Modifier Rate (Typically must be < 1.0)
Supporting Documentation: The owner/operator requires various documents and records be uploaded during the pre-qualification process, including:
• Contractors Licenses
• Tax ID
• Proof of Incorporation
• OSHA 300A Logs
• Various insurance documents
Questionnaire: The owner/operator requires all subcontracting companies to complete a specific questionnaire that asks about company history, financial strengths, job size capabilities, jobsite safety, and more.
Safety Policies: Based on answers to the questionnaire and the type of work the sub-contracting company will be performing, owner/operator requires the sub-contractor to submit their company’s policies/manuals for the hazards they will encounter on the jobsite.
Training Records: Based on answers to the questionnaire and the type of work the sub-contracting company will be performing, owner/operator requires the sub-contractor to submit training records for the subjects relevant to the tasks their employees will be performing on the worksite.
The problem with the current CQ Program model is that it focuses on past performance when it is the safety performance of the company in the near future that owner/operators should truly care about. While past performances can be an indicator of future performance, there are better ways to ensure ongoing safety management. Additionally, the current model relies on the honesty of the applying subcontractors. No contractor is going to make itself look bad while applying for a job. Even if the company looks great on paper, this may be through sheer luck or under-reporting of incidents over the past few years. Finally, and perhaps most critically, the current CQ model’s focus is on the sub-contracting companies and not on the sub-contracting employees. Companies don’t get injured. Companies don’t drive forklifts, work in confined spaces, or on scaffolds. Employees do. Every effective safety program puts employees first; CQ Programs should do the same.
Improving the Current CQ Program Model Down to the Lowest Common Denominator
Imagine you are the Safety Manager for a worksite with over 150 employees representing 15 different sub-contracting companies present on the site today. Sub employees are performing a myriad of hazardous tasks including forklift operations, confined space work, and scaffold work. How do you ensure that any given employee is qualified to perform the task he/she is assigned? By tracking sub-contractor employees in a single database, owner/operators can add these elements to their CQ Program and dramatically improve safety performance across their worksite, ultimately decreasing liability.
Auditing Employees in Real Time: Requiring subcontractor training to be uploaded to a cloud-based database allows owner/operators to check any sub-contractor employee’s training records in real-time on the jobsite.
Ongoing Safety Management: Require subcontractors to submit proof of ongoing safety management to keep safety on everyone’s mind: Daily JSA’s & Weekly Safety Meetings
Badging Employees: Require subcontracting employees to badge in at the gate. Add the following requirements to all subcontracting employees to standardize safety down to the employee level:
• Drug tests
• Background checks
• Training verification
• Site-specific Orientation
*Badging also allows owner/operators to know who is on their site at any given time.
At the end of the day, owner/operators and subcontracting companies are both responsible for the safety of employees on the worksite. While the owner/operator shares this responsibility, sub-contractors would do well to recognize the importance of safety, both for their employees’ wellbeing and for the potential of future work with the client. Shifting Contractor Qualification programs to focus on individual employee safety and emphasize continued safety monitoring increases overall compliance, reduces incidents, injuries, and contractor employee turnover, and ultimately achieves a significant return on investment for everyone involved.
Recommended Reading
Insurance Reviews Are Not Inspections
Most owners think about audit-readiness as one thing. Pass the OSHA inspection, stay current on prequal requirements, keep the insurance renewal from getting complicated. One program, built to satisfy whoever happens to be asking. That framing is really the problem. An OSHA inspection, an insurance review, and a GC prequal evaluation are three separate assessments…
Why Binders Fail Under Pressure
Picture the owner of a 60-person specialty contractor the morning an OSHA inspector shows up unannounced. He knows the safety program is in decent shape. The policies are written. Inspections have been happening. Training got done before the last big project kicked off. He walks to the filing cabinet, pulls out the binder, and hands…
Luck Is Not a Safety Record
Most owners know whether their safety record is good. Fewer of them know whether their safety program is good. Those are different things — and confusing one for the other is one of the more expensive mistakes in safety management. The Company With No Incidents and No Program This company exists. You may know one.…
How Safety Failures Cascade
Safety failures rarely arrive alone. That’s the part most owners miss — not because they haven’t thought about safety, but because the sequence isn’t visible until after something goes wrong. A near-miss doesn’t get reported. The hazard stays open. The hazard eventually produces an incident. The incident produces an OSHA visit with citations and fines.…
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SIMPLIFIED
Prevent Tragedy and Scale Effectively by Making Safe Work Efficient